GEOC for Faculty

 GEOC logo

 

 

 

The GE, Overlay, and Code (GEOC) Subcommittee of CIC reviews proposals for new GEOC certifications, revisions to existing GEOC courses, and existing GEOC courses up for recertification, using the GE Framework 2024 2025 that contains the current learning outcomes. All the information on this page is provided in greater detail in the Faculty Guide to GEOC Course Approvals.  Faculty should also consult the that GEOC created to help everyone create good proposals. 

MISSION

The GEOC Subcommittee ensures that courses approved for GE, Overlay, and/or Code credit reflect the spirit of general education.  In reviewing courses, the committee looks for evidence that a course has, at its heart, the GEOC learning outcomes and that these outcomes are the primary focus of and fully integrated into the course. In particular, GEOC learning outcomes should not seem incidental or inserted into an existing non-GEOC course.  Course-specific learning outcomes, content, activities, and assignments/assessments must mutually reinforce the GEOC learning outcomes; and the elements of GE should be present even in the course description. Also, a general education course needs to be accessible by all students (so any student should be able to walk into a GE course and be able to succeed), so it has been our policy to not accept GE course proposals that have a number of prerequisites or to accept courses that are for majors only.

If you need help creating/revising your course-specific learning outcomes, you can contact the Director of General Education, Kevin Kaatz (kevin.kaatz@csueastbay.edu) or see Indiana University's for creating assessable learning outcomes or Stanford's for help/advice.  

 

 

Process and Timeline

Senate policy establishes a Timeline for Curricular Changes (), and the Curricular Procedures Manual describes the approval process for new course, revision, and recertification requests. The approval process for GEOC courses is highlighted below.  All processes are originated, routed, and tracked through Curriculog.

All course proposals must be launched in Curriculog by Sept. 15.  Course proposals revision/recertification requests must pass the College Curriculum Committee step and reach the Academic Affairs step by October 15th.  

 2023 Revised Course Approval Timeline

Course proposals/revision/recertification requests that do not reach Academic Affairs by October 15 must be re-submitted using the appropriate Curriculog form for the next catalog year.

GEOC Recertification Cycle


Existing GEOC courses will be reviewed by the GEOC Subcommittee on 5-year intervals. The figure (below) shows the review cycle beginning with the 2024-2025 academic year. Important points to note:

  • Any existing GEOC course that is not approved by the committee for recertification will lose its GEOC certification(s), effective Fall 2025.
  • Course recertification reviews will occur according to the schedule regardless of when the course was originally certified.
  • Courses that carry a GE along with an Overlay and/or Code certifications will be reviewed for all certifications according to the GE designation. 
  • GE Areas B1/2/3 will be recertified in Fall 2024.
  • Course recertification requests must reach Academic Affairs by October 15.  

2024-2025 Recertification Cycle

Making A GEOC Course Approval Request

The Curricular Procedures Manual provides step-by-step instructions, timelines, and other necessary information needed for launching new course requests, course revision requests, or other curricular changes to academic programs at Cal State East Bay. These procedures are in compliance with local CSUEB policy, CSU Chancellor's Office guidelines, and WASC accreditation standards. The details most germane to GEOC course requests are explained with step-by-step instructions in the Faculty Guide to GEOC Course Approvals.  

Curriculog Logo

All GEOC course approval requests/forms should be created, launched, and tracked exclusively online via , CSUEB's curriculum management platform.   

Contact Julie Mielke and Rick Rader at catalog@csueastbay.edu for any Curriculog-related questions, issues, or training.

GEOC Review Criteria

Carefully follow the instructions detailed in the Curriculog New Proposal form. The Director of General Education and the GEOC Subcommittee base their evaluations and decisions on the information provided in the actual course syllabi and proposal form. The syllabus and the proposal form must align. This information will be used to determine whether the course clearly meets all the stated GEOC learning outcomes and course characteristics (if applicable) in each instructional format proposed. Note that GEOC will accept a representative syllabus for new course proposals.

Make sure to complete all the necessary sections in the Curriculog Course Proposal Form.  In particular, the GEOC Subcommittee will look closely at the following information in its review process:

  • Course Information 
  • Evidence of Course Alignment to GEOC Learning Outcomes 
  • Course Characteristics, if applicable  (see below)
  • Course Syllabus (uploaded to Curriculog form; provide an actual course syllabus for each instructional mode--fully on-ground, hybrid, and/or fully online) OR you can provide one syllabus with all teaching modes, as long as it is clear to GEOC how the course is taught differently when asynchronous, synchronous, and on-ground. 

Course Characteristics

Course Characteristics
GE/Breadth Area Learning Outcomes Course Characteristics
A1 Oral Communication

GE Area A1 courses emphasize communication theory and provide several speaking and listening experiences in multiple modes, e.g., small-group discussion, interpersonal communication, and persuasive discourse presented extemporaneously.

Upon completion of the GE Area A1 requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Speak effectively when making oral presentations in English;
  2. Explain the principles of effective oral communication, including form, content, context, and style;
  3. Advocate for a cause or idea, presenting facts and arguments in an organized and accurate manner; and
  4. Critically evaluate oral presentations.
The A1 course is primarily based upon communication theory presented through lecture, discussion, and reading. It must provide several face-to-face opportunities for a planned sequence of speaking and listening experiences in two or more of the following modes:
a) small-group (problem-solving) discussion, b) interpersonal communication,
c) expository discourse presented extemporaneously,
d) argumentative and persuasive discourse presented extemporaneously.
Students must complete three or more assignments to demonstrate increasing skill in oral communication. Instructors must provide students with frequent feedback and constructive criticism on students’ oral presentations. For online or hybrid classes, a minimum of 50% of the speaking and listening activities must be synchronous, interactive experiences. Recorded formats are allowed to accommodate the online environment.
A2 Written Communication

GE Area A2 courses emphasize the rhetorical principles that govern reading and writing. These principles are fundamental to logical thinking and clear expression. For reading, they presumeopen-mindedness combined with critical thinking and analytical skills. For writing, they presume an awareness of audience, context, and purpose.

Upon completion of the GE Area A2 requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Explain and demonstrate the principles and rhetorical perspectives of effective writing in English, including its form, content, and style;
  2. Advocate for a cause or idea, presenting facts and arguments in an organized and accurate manner; and
  3. Practice the discovery, critical evaluation, and reporting of information.
A2 courses will have a corresponding support class for students classified as needing support.
A3 Critical Thinking and Composition

GE Area A3 courses emphasize the development of clarity and rigor in reasoning and its presentation, and the ability to understand, represent, and evaluate the presentations of reasoning made by others.

Upon completion of the GE Area A3 requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Identify, analyze, and evaluate arguments;
  2. Logically construct arguments to support and refute claims using evidence;
  3. Reason inductively and deductively; and
  4. Distinguish matters of fact from judgments, opinions, and/or fallacies

5. write for at least two different audiences (e.g. academic, general, and/or professional);
6. engage in writing for specific purposes (e.g. critical thinking, analytical writing, informal writing, and/or research);
7. apply critical thinking and logical reasoning in the development and organization of ideas in written texts;
8. consider multiple perspectives using primary and/or secondary sources, and when appropriate, incorporate key disciplinary concepts when presenting ideas in writing;
9. revise writing with critical feedback provided by the instructor at important junctures throughout the semester in order to improve development, clarity, coherence, and correctness


Critical Thinking and Composition courses will include assignments or other assessable activity in which students apply the following skills:

  1. Written assignments (e.g., argumentative essays, analyses of arguments, reflective writing, drafts of papers) with critical feedback provided by the instructor to the students at important junctures throughout the semester.
  2. Collaboration (e.g., structured peer review; dialogue analyzing different sides of an argument, based on evidence; group or class projects)
  3. Information Literacy: use of search strategies to explore information sources (e.g. search terms, truncation, filters, choice of database and/or library resources) and evaluation of gathered sources for relevance and credibility (e.g. peer-reviewed, author expertise, context, timeliness)
  4. substantive instruction addresses various aspects of writing (critical thinking, analytical writing, informal writing, and/or research), including strategies for generating and organizing information, as well as editing;
  5. students have opportunities to revise multi-draft essays in response to peer/tutor/instructor feedback;
  6. students produce a minimum of 5,000 words in a variety of assignments, occurring throughout the course (i.e. not just one final assignment at the end)
  7. courses enroll no more than 30 students.
B1 Physical Science

Upon completion of the GE Area B1 requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate knowledge of scientific theories, concepts, and data about the physical sciences;
  2. Demonstrate an understanding of scientific practices, including the scientific method; and
  3. Describe the potential limits of scientific endeavors, including the accepted standards and ethics associated with scientific inquiry.
B2 Life Science

Upon completion of the GE Are B2 requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate knowledge of scientific theories, concepts, and data about the life sciences;
  2. Demonstrate an understanding of scientific practices, including the scientific method; and
  3. Describe the potential limits of scientific endeavors, including the accepted standards and ethics associated with scientific inquiry.
B3 Laboratory Activity

GE Area B3 courses emphasize active engagement, collaboration, hands-on experiences that facilitate understanding of science concepts and the development of sound science practices and habits of mind.

Upon completion of the GE Area B3 requirement, student will be able to:

  1. 91探花 their knowledge of scientific theories, concepts, and data about the physical and life sciences through laboratory activities;
  2. 91探花 their understanding of scientific practices, including the scientific method in a laboratory setting; and
  3. 91探花 accepted standards related to safety and ethics associated with conducting and communicating scientific inquiry, while completing laboratory activities.
B3 courses will emphasize safety and collaboration in laboratory or field activities, especially focusing on data collection, analysis, and presentation.
B4 Math/ Quantitative Reasoning

GE Area B4 courses provide practice in computational skills as well as engagement in more complex mathematical work.

Upon completion of the GE Area B4 requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate a proficient and fluent ability to reason quantitatively;
  2. Demonstrate a general understanding of how practitioners and scholars collect and analyze data, build mathematical models, and/or solve quantitative problems; and
  3. 91探花 quantitative reasoning skills in a variety of real-world contexts, defined by personal, civic, and/or professional responsibilities.
In B4 courses, students will not just practice computational skills, but will engage in more complex mathematical work, in accordance with the CSU GE B4 Guidelines and Principles. B4 courses will have a corresponding support class for students classified as needing support. Exceptions may be made for B4 courses that have another B4 as a prerequisite, such as Calculus.
C1 Arts

GE Area C1 courses integrate the evaluative and descriptive aspects of the history, theory, aesthetics, and criticism of different works, forms, styles, and schools of art.

Upon completion of the GE Area C1 requirement, students will be able to:

1. Evaluate the impact of the arts on their life.
2. Examine the cultural and/or historical context(s) of the arts.
3. Describe the ways that diverse identities influence the creation and experience of art.
4. Identify the role of art in diverse settings.

 

C2 Humanities

GE Area C2 courses emphasize the ideas and theories behind the intellectual and cultural traditions of humans using historical, linguistic, literary, philosophical, and rhetorical approaches and methods.

Upon completion of the GE Area C2 requirement, students will be able to:

1. Evaluate the impact of the humanities on your life.
2. Examine the cultural and/or historical context(s) of the humanities.
3. Describe the ways that diverse identities influence experiences in the humanities.

 

D1/2

Upon completion of the GE Area D1-2 requirement, students will be able to:

1. Explain how social, political, and economic institutions and/or principles intersect with each other;
2. Describe how people produce, resist, and/or transform social, political, and economic institutions/principles;
3. Investigate contemporary and/or historical events/issues from a social science perspective;

 

F Ethnic Studies

Courses must meet 3 of the following 5 outcomes, and the 3 outcomes that are met in the course will be published in the course syllabus.

Upon completion of the Area F requirement, students will achieve at least 3 of the following outcomes:

  1. Using a comparative or focused approach, explain and analyze core concepts such as racialization, racism, white supremacy, racial capitalism, critical race theory, intersectionality, women of color feminisms, queer of color theory, (counter)hegemony, eurocentrism, self-determination, food justice in communities of color, environmental justice, liberation, decolonization, genocide, sovereignty, indigeneity, imperialism, settler colonialism, anti-Blackness, or anti-racism as analyzed in Native American/American Indian/Indigenous Studies, Chicana/o/x or Latina/o/x Studies, African American/Black/Africana/African Descended/Descendent of Enslaved African Studies, Asian/Pacific Islander/Middle Eastern/South Asian (APIMESA) American Studies.
  2. 91探花 theory and knowledge such as Critical Race Studies and Women of Color feminisms produced by American Indians/Native Americans/Indigenous people, African Americans/Black people/African diasporic/African Descended/Descendant of Enslaved Africans, Asian/Pacific Islanders/Middle Eastern/South Asian (APIMESA) Americans and/or Latinas/os/xs or Chicanos/as/xs to describe the critical events, histories, cultures, intellectual traditions, contributions, lived experiences, and social struggles of those groups with a particular emphasis on group affirmation, agency, and praxis.
  3. Critically analyze the Black feminist concept of intersectionality and the intersection of race, class, and gender with other axes of oppression including sexuality, sexual violence, religion/spirituality, national origin, immigration and citizenship status, ability, Indigenous sovereignty, language, and/or age as they apply to African American/Black/African diasporic/African Descended/Descendant of Enslaved African, Chicana/o/x or Latina/o/x, Asian/Pacific Islander/Middle Eastern/South Asian (APIMESA) American, and/or Native American/American Indian/Indigenous communities.
  4. Critically review how struggle, resistance, rematriation, social justice activism, solidarity, abolition, and liberation, as experienced, enacted, and studied by American Indians/Native Americans/Indigenous people, African Americans/Black people/African diasporic/African Descended/Descendant of Enslaved Africans, Asian/Pacific Islanders/Middle Eastern/South Asian (APIMESA) Americans and/or Latinas/os/xs or Chicanos/as/xs are relevant to current and structural issues such as communal, national, international, and transnational politics as for example, in health disparities, educational inequities, immigration policies, reparations, settler-colonialism, language policies, media depictions of ethnic/racial groups, racial and sexual violence, prison industrial complex, community development, gentrification, and/or other ethnic politics.
  5. Describe and actively engage with American Indian/Native American/Indigenous, African American/Black/African diasporic/African Descended/Descendant of Enslaved African, Asian/Pacific Islander/Middle Eastern/South Asian (APIMESA) American and/or Latina/o/x or Chicano/a/x communities to apply anti-racist, anti-colonial, humanizing, and women of color feminist frameworks to radically reimagine their communities as sites of justice and love

All courses approved for Area F must demonstrate use of Ethnic Studies pedagogies as evidenced by
1. centering decolonization, self-determination, and anti-racism as central components within Ethnic Studies teaching;
2. developing students’ critical consciousness (or their critical understanding of the world and their place in it);
3. including culturally responsive approaches that build upon students’ experiences and perspectives;
4. creating caring and empathetic academic environments;
5. building upon students’ cultural knowledge so that students find the agency to create culture and communities amongst themselves; 6. developing students’ agency so that they can use their education to respond to the needs in their communities beyond the classroom.

All courses must include study of resistance, social justice work, and agency of groups.

UD-B Upper- division Science Inquiry and Quantitative Reasoning

GE UD-B courses may focus on any area of the natural sciences or mathematics.

Upon completion of the GE UD-B requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate advanced and/or focused science or quantitative content knowledge in a specific scientific field, using appropriate vocabulary and referencing appropriate concepts (such as models, uncertainties, hypotheses, theories, and technologies);
  2. 91探花 advanced quantitative skills (such as statistics, algebraic solutions, interpretation of graphical data) to scientific problems and evaluate scientific claims;
  3. Demonstrate understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry and the experimental and empirical methodologies used in science to investigate a scientific question or issue; and
  4. 91探花 science content knowledge to contemporary scientific issues (e.g., global warming) and technologies (e.g., cloning), where appropriate.

UD-B courses should include assignments that, where possible, allow for the assessment of the following:
a) Information literacy. Students should be able to describe how they determined what information they needed to complete their analysis or research, how they evaluated the validity of their sources, and show proper integration/citation of their sources in their work, as well as apply their abilities to differentiate between science and pseudo- science.


b) Critical thinking in the context of a scientific or quantitative discipline. For example, students should be able to explain the methodologies by which conclusions are reached, and limitations of models used that may affect the reliability of those conclusions.

C) Collaboration and teamwork with peers.

UD-C Upper- division Arts or Humanities

Upon completion of the GE UD-C requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate an understanding of and ability to apply principles, methodologies, value systems, and thought processes employed in the arts and humanities;
  2. Analyze cultural production as an expression of, or reflection upon, what it means to be human; and
  3. Demonstrate how the perspectives of the arts and humanities are used by informed, engaged, and reflective citizens to benefit local and global communities.

UD-C courses will include assignments or other assessable activities in which students apply the following skills:
a) Advanced written (minimum of a combined 4,000 assigned words in, e.g., reflective writing, drafts of papers) with critical feedback provided by the instructor to the students. Students demonstrate mastery of all A2 requirements with evidence of sophistication in composition and critical thinking.
b) Advanced oral communication (e.g., formal presentations, debates) with critical feedback provided by the instructor to the students. Students demonstrate mastery of all A1 requirements, including the ability to give a presentation with a confident presence, critical thinking, and professionalism that is appropriate for the audience, is clear and logical, and demonstrates mastery of the subject at hand;

c) Information literacy, in which students describe how they determined what information they needed to complete their analysis or research, how they evaluated the validity of their sources, and show proper integration/citation of their sources in their work; and
d) Collaboration or teamwork with peers.

UD-D Upper- division Social Sciences

Upon completion of the GE UD-D requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Analyze how power and social identity affect social outcomes for different cultural and economic groups using methods of social science inquiry and vocabulary appropriate to those methods;
  2. Demonstrate an understanding of and ability to apply accurately disciplinary concepts of the social or behavioral sciences; and
  3. Demonstrate an understanding of and the ability to effectively plan or conduct research using an appropriate method of the social or behavioral sciences.

UD-D courses will include assignments or other assessable activities in which students apply the following skills:
a) Advanced written (minimum of a combined 4,000 assigned words in, e.g., analytical writing, research proposals/papers, drafts of papers) with critical feedback provided by the instructor to the students. Students demonstrate mastery of all A2 requirements with evidence of sophistication in composition, argumentation, and critical thinking.
b) Information literacy, in which students describe how they determined what information they needed to complete their analysis or research, how they evaluated the validity of their sources, and show proper integration/citation of their sources in their work; and
c) Collaboration or teamwork with peers.

Diversity Overlay learning outcomes

Upon completion of the Diversity Overlay requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Describe the histories and/or experiences of one or more U. S. cultural groups and the resilience and agency of group members;
  2. Identify structures of oppression and the diverse efforts and strategies used by groups to combat the effects of oppressive structures;
  3. Analyze the intersection of the categories of race and gender as they affect cultural group members’ lived realities and/or as they are embodied in personal and collective identities.
  4. Recognize the way that multiple differences (including, for example, gender, class, sexuality, religion, disability, immigration status, gender expression, color/phenotype, racial mixture, linguistic expression, and/or age) within cultural groups complicate individual and group identities.

For the purposes of this document “cultural group(s)” refers to historically oppressed groups in the United States such as: African Americans, Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders, Latinos/as, American Indians, Arab Americans, women, and GLBTQ (gays, lesbians, bisexuals, transgender, and queer identified people).

 

Social Justice Learning Outcomes

Upon completion of the Social Justice Overlay requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Use a disciplinary perspective to analyze issues of social justice and equity;
  2. Describe the challenges to achieving social justice; and
  3. Identify ways in which individuals and/or groups can contribute to social justice within local communities, nations, or the world.
Sustainability Learning Outcomes

Upon completion of the Sustainability Overlay requirement, students will be able to:

  1. Identify the environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability, either in general or in relation to a specific problem;
  2. Analyze interactions between human activities and natural systems;
  3. Describe key threats to environmental sustainability; and
  4. Explain how individual and societal choices affect prospects for sustainability at the local, regional, and/or global levels.
US-1 Code:  U.S. History Learning Outcomes

Upon completion of a US-1 course, students will be able to:

  1. Explain the significance or interpretation of major historical events in a period of at least a hundred years of American history;
  2. Describe the contributions of major ethnic and social groups in a period of at least a hundred years of American history; and
  3. Explain the role of at least three of the following in the development of American culture: politics, economics, social movements, and/ or geography.
US-2 Code:  U.S. Constitution Learning Outcomes

Upon completion of a US-2 course, students will be able to:

  1. Describe the development of the Constitution from the political philosophies of its framers to its later interpretation and amendments;
  2. Explain how the Constitution influenced the development of American political institutions and government; and
  3. Explain citizen rights and responsibilities under the Constitution.
US-3 California Government

Upon completion of a US-3 course, students will be able to:

1. Describe the role of California’s Constitution in state and local government;

2. Explain the place of California’s Constitution in the evolution of federal-state relations; and

3. Describe the political processes that enable cooperation and conflict resolution between state and/or local governments and the federal government.

 

Second Composition

1. complete a variety reading and writing tasks that incorporate subject-matter knowledge;
2. adjust their writing for different audiences, showing awareness of expectations for academic writing in general and adhering to discipline-specific conventions when appropriate;
3. demonstrate critical thinking and logical reasoning, including strategies common in a discipline, in the development and organization of ideas in written texts;
4. take into account multiple perspectives and key disciplinary concepts when presenting their ideas in writing; and
5. revise their writing in response to feedback in order to improve development, clarity,
coherence, and correctness.

1. write for at least two different audiences (e.g. academic, general, and/or professional);
2. engage in writing for specific purposes (e.g. critical thinking, analytical writing, informal writing, and/or research);
3. apply critical thinking and logical reasoning in the development and organization of ideas in written texts;
4. consider multiple perspectives using primary and/or secondary sources, and when appropriate, incorporate key disciplinary concepts when presenting ideas in writing;
5. revise writing with critical feedback provided by the instructor at important junctures throughout the semester in order to improve development, clarity, coherence, and correctness.

GEOC Subcommittee Decisions

Below is a summary diagram of what happens to a course proposal once the committee renders a decision to approve, table, or reject.

geoc-decisions.png 

 

 

MONITOR YOUR CURRICULOG COURSE PROPOSAL

Keep track of all comments and alerts posted to your Curriculog proposal once it leaves your step. The proposal may be rejected or delayed due to incorrect or missing information. Prompt response to any proposal delay will ensure the proposal moves through the approval steps as expeditiously as possible and increases the chances of GEOC approval.
The most common problems that delay course proposals at the Academic Affairs/GEOC steps are:

  • Official Catalog course descriptions are not included on the syllabi (usually resulted in conditional approval)
    GE Learning Outcomes and/or Overlay Learning Outcomes are not included on the syllabi (usually resulted in conditional approval).
  • What is in Curriculog does not match with the syllabi that were presented to GEOC (usually resulted in tabling the proposal). We determined that this was primarily caused from old semester-conversion materials being imported into Curriculog and the way the courses were actually being taught did not correspond to what was in Curriculog.
  • While not totally the purview of GEOC, we found that some of the student learning outcomes were the same as program learning outcomes. GEOC asked CIC to look at this issue. In the end we had to ignore this, but we did not allow new GE course proposals to use program learning outcomes as SLOs (see GEOC Guide to Faculty for this policy)

In addition, keep track of when your course will be on the GEOC Subcommittee meeting agenda and up for discussion/review. GEOC meetings are open to all faculty guests. You may request a time certain from the GEOC Subcommittee Chair. The GEOC Subcommittee meets on the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays of each month during the academic year by Zoom.

 

EXEMPLARY COURSE PROPOSALS

Here's a list of some GEOC-certified courses that have submitted exemplary GEOC proposals.  These proposals are accessible in .

Search Tip:
In Curriculog > Proposals > All Proposals > 
In Keyword, search ART%323 (with "%" in between ART and 323, thus ART%323.
Then, in "Proposal Status" check "Completed".
Next, in the "Process Type" dropdown, choose "Course."
Lastly, click "Filter Proposals" for results, and you will find only "ART 323" proposals.

  • | Social Justice Overlay
    Proposal: "1-CR-1: Course - Breadth (GEOC) - Recertification ONLY (2021-22 AY)"
  • | D1-2, Social Justice Overlay, and Code
    Proposal: "Z-2-CR1: Course - GR Certification/Re-Certification - US Code 1, 2, or 3 - New/Revision (2020-21 AY)"
    Proposal: "Z-2-CR1: Course - GR Certification/Re-Certification - Social Justice Overlay - New/Revision (2020-21 AY)"
    Proposal: "Z-2-CR1: Course - GE Certification/Re-Certification - Area D1-3 Social Sciences - New/Revision (2020-21 AY)"
  • | Area F Ethnic Studies and Social Justice Overlay
    Proposal: "Z-2-CR1: Course - GR Certification/Re-Certification - Social Justice Overlay - New/Revision (2020-21 AY)"
    Proposal: "Z-2-CR1: Course - GE Certification/Re-Certification - Area F Ethnic Studies - New/Revision (2020-21 AY)"
  • | UD-C and Sustainability Overlay
    Proposal: "Z-2-CR1: Course - GE Certification/Re-Certification - Area C4 Upper-Division Arts or Humanities - New/Revision (2020-21 AY)"
    Proposal: "Z-2-CR1: Course - GR Certification/Re-Certification - Sustainability Overlay - New/Revision (2020-21 AY)"
  • | UD-D and Code
    Proposal: "1-CR-1: Course - Breadth (GEOC) - Recertification ONLY (2021-22 AY)"
  • | UD-D and Diversity Overlay
    Proposal: "1-CR-1: Course - Breadth (GEOC) - Recertification ONLY (2021-22 AY)"
  • | GE-E
    Proposal: "1-CN1: Breadth (GEOC) - NEW ((2021-22 AY)"
  • | GE-D1-2
    Proposal: "1-CN1: Breadth (GEOC) - NEW ((2021-22 AY)"

CONTACT INFO

Email the Director of General Education and Chair of the GEOC Subcommittee with any questions or concerns about the GEOC course application or approval process at: Kevin Kaatz (kevin.kaatz@csueastbay.edu)